![]() You'll need an RTX 20 or 30 series card or an AMD equivalent for higher resolutions, frame rates, or to utilize The Ascent's gorgeous implementation of ray tracing. Some frame dips during busy encounters are to be expected with this title, although the stuttering issues present at launch seem to be fixed now. The recommended specs call for a GTX 1070 and Ryzen 5 2600, aiming for a 1080p, 60 FPS gameplay experience. As great as this game looks, you'll need an impressive PC to get the most out of this title. Fortunately, this game's dynamic resolution scaling option means mid-range PCs and even the Steam Deck can run this game at respectable frame rates.įew games showcase the cyberpunk art style quite as well as The Ascent, a cooperative top-down shooter that features excellent particle effects and lighting. A GTX 1060 is recommended to play this title at 1080p, but anyone looking to play at 1440p or 4K will need a higher-end GPU. Improvements to the game's shader compiling, DLSS support, and tons of performance improvements have made Horizon Zero Dawn a solid PC port that pushes modern systems to their limits. Now that some time has passed, how does Zero Dawn fare today? Horizon Zero Dawn blew PlayStation players away with its stunning visuals when it was first released, yet its rough PC release pushed many players away from it. What was once a PlayStation exclusive has made its way to PC in 2020. Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) / AMD Radeon RX 580 Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 / AMD Radeon R9 290 Ray tracing is inexplicably missing from this title, but it does feature Nvidia's Reflex and DLSS technologies, alongside a wide selection of sharpening and upscaling options for all PCs. Upscaling, 4K resolution, and tons of detailed assets can give your video card a serious stress test with the highest settings. That might not rock the boat by modern standards, yet the game has tons of scalability settings. As you'd expect, it's also the franchise's most graphically demanding title yet, requiring a GTX 1060 and Ryto play at 1080p 60 FPS. So this article is basically functions as a performance chart overview.Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (2022)-not to be confused with Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (2009)-is the latest entry in the Call of Duty series, featuring a plethora of new game types, weapons, and more. This article is nothing more then a performance overview of all four processors released yesterday. In this article we'll review the AMD FX 8150 - 8120 - 61 in a quickie performance review. It is AMD's most high-end and processor series to date, yet will remain an affordable processor series.ĪMD FX 8150 - 8120 - 61 performance review Also known as the Vishera generation with PileDriver cores, today FX 8300 series is tested. You guys have been hearing the magic word 'Vishera' for a while now and it is the codename for the Piledriver core based FX series processors f. We review the AMD FX 83E processor today. ![]() It's Vishera time again, and yeah that is the codename for the Piledriver core based FX series processors from AMD. We review the AMD FX 8320E processor today. ![]() It's exactly in applications like these where processors with more cores really shine as they are all utilized to the maximum. The higher the number, the faster the performance is. The displayed number is the number of frames rendered per second averaged out over the encoding process. This software is also a perfect benchmark for CPU and memory testing. the more processor cores it sees, the faster it can and will transcode. We use the Handbrake software suite which is multi-core aware. It's compressed in such a way that you can play it back with Haali media splitter and/or FFDSHOW codecs. We encode a h.2P trailer of 150 MB to Matroska x.264 with 5.1 channels AC3. As such this is one of the better tests in the entire review. Encoding/transcoding to x.264 format is one of the most intensive tasks a processor can perform. Video transcoding is well suited for systems that have more CPU cores. This measurement is in seconds needed for the process, thus lower = better. In this test we transcode a 200 MB AVCHD 1920x1080i media file to a 1280x720P MP4 binary (YouTube format). The fun thing about this video transcoder is that it can utilize the GPU to assist it with the transcoding process. However, you can also solely use the CPU, making this a very interesting benchmark as you can check out behavior of CPU transcoding AND GPU transcoding all in one test.Ībove, you can find the results of this new test. We recently added another benchmark to the test-suite.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |